{"id":200426,"date":"2021-04-13T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-04-13T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2021\/04\/13\/always-read-the-footnotes\/"},"modified":"2021-04-13T18:00:00","modified_gmt":"2021-04-13T23:00:00","slug":"always-read-the-footnotes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2021\/04\/13\/always-read-the-footnotes\/","title":{"rendered":"Always Read the Footnotes"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n
\n
\n

holy shit I’ve rarely seen a footnote used to such devastating effect. https:\/\/t.co\/FjHRNcZYzE<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/sk597elmBR<\/a> <\/p>\n

\u2014 Jathan Sadowski (@jathansadowski) April 13, 2021<\/a> <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Tweet that led me to the footnote<\/i><\/div>\n

A while ago, (correctly) I called Bill Gates a mass murderer for his efforts to prevent open source vaccines from being released<\/a>, with his insistence that any vaccine be licensed exclusively to one for-profit entity. <\/p>\n

I still say that and now The New Republic<\/i> says the same thing<\/a>, complete with a ghastly portrait of Gates with horns. <\/p>\n

They go through the history of IP absolutism and how it has harmed people, and refer us to the case of South Africa and AIDS drugs where Big Pharma and their evil minions in government and the media suggested that compulsory licensing and generics would lead to the spread of drug resistant variants of HIV, because Africans are lazy and disorganized people who won’t take their pills regularly.  (In reality, Africans took their pills more reliably than their privileged brothers in the rest. <\/p>\n

After mentioning this, there is an asterisk, and at the bottom of the page is a footnote about TNR<\/i>‘s former editor-in-chief Andrew Sullivan:<\/p>\n

*<\/sup>Among journalists echoing this argument was former New Republic<\/i> editor Andrew Sullivan. When The New York Times<\/i> reported Sullivan was defending the companies\u2019 lawsuit while taking undisclosed funding from PhRma<\/a>, the industry trade association, Sullivan remained defiant in the face of evidence-based accusations that he was an unethical journalist<\/span><\/b>. \u201cIt behooves me to say I see absolutely no problems with [drug industry sponsorship],\u201d he told Salon<\/i>. \u201cIn fact, I am extremely proud to get some support from a great industry.\u201d It later turned out that Africans adhered more closely to the twice-daily pill regimens than patient populations in rich countries.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

They just called their editor in the early 1990s, a racist hypocrite dirtbag. (Mark Ames has a rather good bill of particulars<\/a> on his entire career).<\/p>\n

I think that the publication is distance themseves the damage done by two profoundly toxic people, Sullivan, and former publisher Marty Peretz.<\/p>\n

It’s a glorious take-down of a thoroughly contemptible human being.<\/p>\n

Just so you know, his “storied career” at TNR included:<\/p>\n