Daniel Convissor's Web Site (is in the midst of reconstruction):

All Aboard the Economic Recovery Flier

To the Editor:

The merits of rail transportation, substantial compared with highways, have been overlooked in coverage of President Clinton's strategy of infrastructure investment for economic recovery. Our dependence on road transport exemplifies the inefficient use of resources in the United States.

Rail transport requires half the energy to carry a given number of people, needs one-eighth the space road transportation needs and costs one-sixteenth as much. Because rail can transport more people to a place, buildings can be built taller and less spread out, and the need for private parking is drastically reduced.

The research of David Alan Aschauer, an economist at Bates College, shows the net benefits of railroad investment are twice as large as highway investment and accrue positive results three times faster.

More than 72 percent of Americans support increased investment in public transportation options.

Budget makers in state houses and city halls should also redirect transportation investments from highways to railroads.

Daniel Convissor
Board Member
Transportation Alternatives
New York, Jan. 28, 1993

This letter was published in the 11 February 1993 edition of The New York Times


Are you having a hard time printing this page? Read the Printing FAQ.

This page is hosted by Daniel Convissor
Home Page: http://www.panix.com/~danielc/
Email: danielc@panix.com

This URL: http://www.panix.com/~danielc/usa/invest.htm
Last updated: 4 April 1999