Daniel Convissor's Web Site (is in the midst of reconstruction):
A Letter to Senator Bryan Regarding Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency
March 15, 1991
Richard H. Bryan
United States Senator
Washington, DC 20510
re: Fuel Efficiency
Greetings Senator Bryan:
I know of your efforts in the Congress to increase the CAFE standards. Here
are some factors which should be brought into the next round of debate.
- Safety is not necessarily compromised while improving fuel efficiency:
- High-tech materials and alloys make significant differences in
component weight while not making the body less solid.
- The severity of an impact is dependent upon the weight of the object.
As the average vehicle become lighter, the severity of the average
accident will decrease.
- The internal combustion engine is highly inefficient, but there are
engines with completely different physical properties. Engine technology
has taken, and can take more, great steps forward. See enclosed
Your position on the Subcommittee on Urban Affairs provides you the ability to
shape the Surface Transportation Assistance act. The following are some major
- Cut roadway expansion funds. Roadway expansion to relieve congestion
leads to an overall increase in fuel consumption. Americans don't love their
cars, they love mobility.
- Provide substantial sums for Amtrak. Railroads used to pay for themselves
and turn hefty profits -- until we subsidized roads. Now Amtrak needs our
- Increase mass transit operating expenditures. Increase the Federal share
and overall spending levels for transit capital programs.
Another measure which would do our nation well is increasing the use of
bicycles by Federal agencies -- the most efficient mode of transportation.
GSA should have bicycles as part of their vehicle pool. Include bicycle
parking in all Federal buildings.
The topic of energy policy, like most subjects, has many facets. These facets
touch on everyone's life. Unlike our current policy which provides only
benefits to some people, implementing the strategies outlined above will
create a policy which provides benefits to all people. I would like to know
of your level of interest in each of these tactics.
- "Free-piston engine" [Popular Science, June 1980, p 50.]
- "Stirling auto engine" [Popular Science, January 1983, p
- "Anti-Noise System..." [I can't find the citation for this particular
article, but a similar one appeared since then: "Keeping It to a Low Roar,"
The New York Times 27 July 1993, p B1.]
- excerpt from Looking for Oil in all the Wrong Places
- Comments on the Surface Transportation
Senator Bryan's reply is also on line
Up to the CAFE Page
Are you having a hard time printing this page? Read the Printing FAQ.
This page is hosted by Daniel Convissor
Home Page: http://www.panix.com/~danielc/
This URL: http://www.panix.com/~danielc/usa/cafebry.htm
Last updated: 4 April 1999