Well, this is one of those issues that leads to heated discussions, so let’s start with my position:
The 5.56 round is just find, and any lethality issues are an artifact that the barrel on the M4 carbine, at 14.5 inches, is too short. The M-16 with its 20 inch barrel does not have the lethality issues.
The solution is to replace the M4 with a Bullpup design with a barrel length of at least 18 inches.
Such a design will still be shorter than the M4, and hence easier to handle in enclosed spaces, such as city warfare.
I would also go with a piston arrangement, as opposed to a gas tube, which to bring too much fouling.
‘Nuff said.
In any case, the Army is now looking at an M4 replacement, and is considering going with something like a 6.5mm or 6.8mm round.
This has all the hallmarks of a fiasco to my mind though. They are bidding a new weapon and allowing for a new caliber at the same time, which means that they will not really be able to compare apples to apples.
It should be interesting on the boards for a while though as various gun religions engage in Jihad.




Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
I’m not sure which I find more disturbing, the belief that the prayers of a self admitted witch hunter somehow got her elected governor, or the complete
Seeing as how the TP400 engine is the major delay item on the A400M transport, the fact taht they