Category: Media

Mark Steiner Show Cancelled

Mark Steiner, who has hosted the local NPR station’s Noon to 2 pm talk show has been fired. They are replacing it with a show called “Statewide”.

It appears that, with WYPR now simulcasting from Western Maryland and the Eastern Shore, that there may have been clashes over the focus of the show. Steiner has spent the bulk of his shows dealing with Baltimore City issues.

In any case, it looks like it might be getting nasty, with Steiner saying that, “his firing was the result of philosophical and personality differences with WYPR President Anthony A. Brandon”, and Barbara Bozzuto, WYPR board chairman, saying that, “Steiner and management had been at odds over what direction his show should take”.

The station’s president’s response is here, but it’s not worth the read. It just mentions unspecified schedule changes, and does not mention Steiner at all.

There’s already been a protest, though that would happen with any major programming change at most public radio stations.

I don’t have a dog in this hunt. I listened to him occasionally, but I’m not generally in the car then.

If anyone has insights, please post them here, or email me (see link on right).

Hillary Clinton Cries Again

Hillary was at an event at the Yale Child Study Center, where she volunteered in law school, and she teared up when her former boss there, Penn Rhodeen, said how proud he was of her.

This is not a story. This should not be a story. Public figures tear up all the time.

Bill Clinton teared up a number of times, his doing so while listening to PMaya Angelou’s poetry comes to mind, Poppy Bush did so at the 50th anniversary of Pearl Harbor, Reagan did every time a boyscout said the pledge of allegiance.

This is, nor should it be a big deal, though doubtless the Sunday gasbags will talk about nothing else..

When Journalism Sucks Wet Farts from Dead Pigeons

When Jake Tapper ran a story suggesting that Bill Clinton suggested that slowing the economy of the developed nations would have to slow their economies to deal with global warming, when he was actually showing that such a strategy would not work.

Here is Bill Clinton’s quote:

“And maybe America, and Europe, and Japan, and Canada — the rich counties — would say, ‘OK, we just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions ’cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.’ We could do that.

But if we did that, you know as well as I do, China and India and Indonesia and Vietnam and Mexico and Brazil and the Ukraine, and all the other countries will never agree to stay poor to save the planet for our grandchildren. The only way we can do this is if we get back in the world’s fight against global warming and prove it is good economics that we will create more jobs to build a sustainable economy that saves the planet for our children and grandchildren. It is the only way it will work.”

(emphasis mine)

But Jake Tapper reported it thusly:

In a long, and interesting speech, he characterized what the U.S. and other industrialized nations need to do to combat global warming this way: “We just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions ’cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.”

At a time that the nation is worried about a recession is that really the characterization his wife would want him making? “Slow down our economy”?

I don’t really think there’s much debate that, at least initially, a full commitment to reduce greenhouse gases would slow down the economy….So was this a moment of candor?

Remarkably hacktacular. In fact, it was so hacktacular that right wing blogs, such as The Corner on National Review Online, and Hot Air are criticizing Jake Tapper for being unfair to Bill Clinton.

When you have right wingers complaining that you are unfair to Bill Clinton, it is clear that you have jumped the shark.

H/t The Carpet Bagger Report

On the Superbowl

I didn’t have a dog in the hunt, I am a Redskins fan, though my wife is bumming. My congratulations to the NY Giants.

However, I don’t think that this is the greatest upset ever. That honor still goes to Joe Namath and the Jets in Super Bowl III.

My favorite ad was the dancing lizards.

Your favorite ads below.

Pay Per View Review

It was movie night, and it was Natalie’s turn to choose, and she chose Shreck the Third. Charlie objected mildly, since he had already seen it at school, but he he enjoyed it once it was on.

Mike Myers … Shrek (voice)
Eddie Murphy … Donkey (voice)
Cameron Diaz … Princess Fiona (voice)
Antonio Banderas … Puss in Boots (voice)
Julie Andrews … Queen Lillian (voice)
John Cleese … King Harold (voice)
Rupert Everett … Prince Charming (voice)
Eric Idle … Merlin (voice)
Justin Timberlake … Artie (voice)

First and foremost, as with any franchise, the question is if it was true to series.

The answer is yes.

The plot is by no means throw-away, with Shreck trying to find a Nephew of the King, Arthur (Artie), so that he does not have to be king.

We also have the vengeful Charming, and some amusing sendups of dinner theater and high school along the way.

The use of music in this movie is the best yet. I’ll never think of Led Zepplin’s The Immigrant Song in the same way.

It is a worthy successor of the first two.

Recommended.

Wanker of The Day: Northwestern U’s Coordinator of Violence Prevention and Sexual Health Education

Here is the cartoon:

It’s pretty straightforward. It’s a call for promiscuity, something I whole heartedly approve of, unless it’s MY daughter.

Unfortunately, you have Northwestern’s Coordinator of Violence Prevention and Sexual Health Education not getting the fact that sex and rape are different things, and so she conflates them.

Letters to the Editor – Forum

Cartoon sexist, offensive

In The Daily on Friday, Jan. 25, a Drawing Board illustration was published depicting an angry stick figure and the message “I like my women like I like my cell phone minutes: Unlimited on nights and weekends.” Directly opposite this image were two Daily articles about the highly publicized sexual assault of an NU student that occurred near campus in May of 2007.

These two items juxtaposed in our student newspaper speak volumes about the culture here at NU. Whether or not the cartoon was created in an attempt to parody the attitude expressed in the quote, the illustration calls into question a set of beliefs about women and sex that research has shown to contribute to the alarmingly regular occurrence of sexual assault on college campuses.

Sexual assaults happen because the sexual aggressor believes that he is entitled to a woman’s body and pursues sexual activity without care or concern about the wishes of the victim. Attitudes like the one expressed in the cartoon reflect and contribute to a cultural climate where women’s value is based on their ability to sexually gratify men. When women are devalued in this manner and sexual relationships between men and women are viewed as adversarial, sexual violence against women is the natural extreme on a continuum of sexually aggressive and exploitative behaviors. In such a climate, the belief that women should be “unlimited” (and the assumption that they are) takes away an individual’s ability to give consent to sexual activity.

Most men who commit rape do not define their behavior as assault and are therefore able to justify their actions to themselves and others. Perpetrators of sexual assault are products of a culture that encourages them to view women as sexual objects and to believe that they are entitled to unlimited sexual access to women.

The belief that the majority of sexual assaults are committed by strangers in dark alleys is a misconception. Perpetrators of sexual assault are not mentally ill or psychotic, as the myths suggest, but rather they are “normal” men on your campus who hold beliefs about women and sex identical to those expressed in the Daily cartoon.

While the cartoon was most likely created in good humor, it is critical to make the connection between this humor and the set of beliefs that perpetuates and justifies sexual assault. We can all play a role in changing the culture at NU by thinking critically about the messages we receive and striving to challenge those that support and condone sexual violence.

– Kathryn Guilfoyle
Coordinator of Violence Prevention and Sexual Health Education
NU Health Education Department

The problem here is a simple one, and it not that the cartoon is crass, and perhaps a bit tasteless.

There is no call for violence. There is no implication of violence. There is a call for promiscuity.

There is a problem however, and that is when a “Coordinator of Violence Prevention” because of a need to justify the existence of such a position.

She is paid to be humorless and easily offended….Come to think of it, perhaps she needs a raise.

In conflating the desire with promiscuity with violence, Ms. Guilfoyle diminishes real, and ongoing threats of sexual violence.

She makes rape becomes about how humorless people find any reference to sex a call for rape, rather than being about the real, and more common than we would like to think, of sexual violence in our society.

Anne Applebaum is Stupid

Really, really, really stupid.

This time, she is claiming that capitalism created beautiful young Russian women.

I went to school with Russian emigres. I’ve seen what they look like. It was good.

There was no change in appearance. It’s just that access to the west was restricted to the well off before the fall of the FSU, and the well off mean middle aged, at least.

Anne Applebaum knows Russia, and I don’t. Anne Applebaum has been to Russia, and I haven’t. But based on my reading of her work through the years, she does not “hang” with us ordinary plebes, she hangs with the movers and shakers.

Russian women, as the saying goes, “clean up good”.

20 Years ago, that did not mean YSL or Chanel’s “little black dress”. I don’t know what Russian fashion was, but it sucked by western standards, though according to my dad, it sucked a lot less in Leningrad than it did in Moscow, at least in 1973.

Of course, Ms. Applebaum is so intent on showing the virtues of the klepto-capitalism that is Russia, she reduces what a woman is to her market value for her appearance.

Clean Coal, Toxic Water

Note that I have just added the Washington Independent to my blogroll…It’s a good source for news and commentary.

Check out this article on the toxic waste of “clean coal”.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s own research, coal ash dumping can lead to higher rates of cancer, developmental problems in children and adverse effects in women of child-bearing age. Despite the fact that coal ash contains mercury, lead, arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium, beryllium, and other toxic metals, the EPA has yet to categorize coal ash as hazardous waste. In addition, coal ash has been found to be up to 100 times more radioactive than nuclear waste, due to the concentrations of uranium and thorium that increase 10-fold after coal is burned.

Broder Calls Out George F. Will By Name

One of the rules of OP/ED bloviating is that if you disagree with another contributor to the editorial page, you never mention them directly.

Calling them out by name is unheard of.

Well, David S. Broder, the sultan of intellect free conventional inside-the-beltway thinking, just broke that rule, and calls out the bow-tied one.

Unelected conservative ideologues — such as Rush Limbaugh and George F. Will— can mutter in frustration, but Republican politicians recognize what was written here as long ago as last Dec. 2: “If the Republican Party really wanted to hold on to the White House in 2009 . . . it would grit its teeth, swallow its doubts and nominate a ticket of John McCain for president and Mike Huckabee for vice president — and president-in-waiting.”

Matthew Yglesias makes much of this, but I disagree.

This is not a sudden abrogation of the rules. Instead it is a conflict between two rules:

  • The unwritten first rule of the op-ed page — you do not talk about other writers on the op-ed page
  • John McCain is a straight shooter, and a good guy, and we love him.

In critiquing John McCain, George Will simply joined the Ancient, Hermetic, and Occult Order of the Shrill, and you are supposed to call out the “shrill” ones by name.

Good Analysis of Pushback (Bushback) Against Bush

I noticed that Americans United for Change will be spending $8.5 million on ads to keep Bush’s approval numbers down for the rest of his term.

My first reaction was that this was a waste of money, public disapproval has never prevented Bush from doing the wrong thing. After all, he has a year left, and who cares.

Steve Benen, of the Carpetbagger, sets me right, and he makes the point that the Republicans have welded themselves to Bush for at least this election cycle, and they won’t begin to extricate themselves from his toxic embrace until after tie 2008 elections.

It’s true, the weaker Bush is, weaker ‘Phants are, and there is this little bon mot of Mr. Benen.

And, one assumes, if John McCain gets the Republican nomination, this initiative, coupled with a ubiquitous picture of McCain hugging Bush, should help tilt the scales a little.

True.

I just wish that I hadn’t been drinking when I read that. Steve Benen ows me a screen cleaner.

Michelle Malkin, Are Her Children in Danger?

She has two children, and we’ve already had instances of what can only be called deranged behavior, such as her stalking of the Graeme Frost family.

Well, now she is saying that she is claiming that John McCain is an agent of George Soros. (H/T Whisky Fire for the catch)

I read Whiskey Fire, and I was amused, and then I read her article, and I was frightened.

Not of George Soros, as was her intent, and not of her wit or intellect, which honestly does not impress me.

I was frightened that in a few years, she would snap, and we would see another one of those stories where the police break down the door, and find that she has drowned her children in the bathtub.

It’s probably not fair, after all, my writing is not indicative of sanity, but I just get this sense that we’re going to read this story in the paper.

Anyone know of a way to help?

I’m sorry, but going to CPS based on my gut, no matter how ample, is just wrong, particularly considering how often my predictions are wrong.

But it’s like watching a slow motion train wreck.

Better Now Than in The General Obama-Rezko Edition

More Obama-Rezko stuff; this time it’s the fact that the Obama campaign has not returned all the Rezko related donations.

Truth be told, I don’t find this particularly meaningful from a policy or corruption position, but I do see it as significant from from a political perspective.

As I’ve said before, one of my concerns about Obama (ignoring the whole gay baiting McClurkin thing) is that he has never been in a serious campaign against a Republican.

He has always run in a dead girl/live boy* safe Democratic district, except for his Senate campaign, which was against Alan Keys, who is so obviously seriously mentally ill that it counts as the same thing.

What he is getting now is less than one one thousandth of what the Republicans would throw at him in the general election, and the his response, and that of his campaign, has generally been pretty good.

Besides, getting this cleared up in the primary, is better than waiting for the general.

*Edwin Edwards, when discovering that he would be facing David Duke in the Louisiana governor’s race, said that the the only way that he would lose were if he were, “caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy”.