Category: Presidential Campaign

A Rebuttal to An Earlier Post

I made a post on Barack Obama’s policies regarding the stimulus package, and Barack Obama’s and specifically his advisor, Austan Goolsbee’s position on the low income heating assistance program.

Dr. Goolsbee took exception to my post in the comments, and has granted me permission to reproduce it as a post, which follows:

This is totally bogus. I have never opposed LIHEAP as a program and neither has Senator Obama (who has voted many times to fund the program). The only objection to the program–in the CNBC clip and in all previous discussions–is trying to use LIHEAP as a stimulus program. Because there is an application process, it won’t get out the door quickly. Obama’s stimulus plan would cut checks for low income people that are BIGGER than the LIHEAP checks and would send them the money right away.

Proof that I support LIHEAP just not as a stimulus, see the debate over stimulus is the NY Observer of January 24

“For the most part, Goolsbee had little to take issue with. He had a much bigger problem with the Clinton plan’s call for $25 billion in emergency energy assistance for families facing skyrocketing heating bills. Goolsbee’s criticism of this component was consistent with his major beef with Clinton’s entire stimulus plan, which is that it would take way too long to enact, and therefore wouldn’t provide for any real stimulus at all.

Here’s Goolsbee’s critique: “It is a very detailed program. It is a very good program that people are familiar with but it just isn’t a stimulus. It is for winter heat and by the time this thing gets through we’d be talking about next winter. Two, it’s a five to 10-page application process which is significantly onerous.

He added, “After convincing the people to apply and getting them to fill out the application process, you then have an evaluation process, so this will take many months if not a year to get out the door.”

Note: there were some apostrophes that were munged by haloscan that I corrected. Otherwise it is as posted.

Republican Vote Theft in Washington State

It appears that the Washington State Republican committee is doing its level best to fix the result of their caucuses.

The State Republican Party declared a victor with only 87.2% of the votes counted, despite the fact that the spread between McCain and Huckabee is only 1.8%.

The reason given by the Chair of the state party?

Maybe it would have been safer if I hadn’t said anything. But it was an exciting and historic day for the state and I thought if I was confident about what the outcome would be I should share that with the people who had gone out to their caucuses.

Huckabee is protesting and sending lawyers, additionally, he’s evoking the USSR in this matter:

I would also note that this is just plain stupid. It potentially takes a couple of delegates from Huckabee, but he makes it a cause celebre for Huckabee supporters, shoots holes in McCain’s “straight shooter” myth, and is the easiest possible way to split the party.

Why, yes, I am feeling some glee regarding the discomfort that this is causing!

David Shuster Initially Defended the “Pimped” Statement

If you think that the video I posted of David Shuster’s “Pimping Chelsea” comment seemed to show an insincere apology, the email exchange with the Clinton campaign confirms that he was even less sincere than his bull%$#@ “If anyone was offended” faux apology.

A bit of the exchange, (Philippe Reines is a Clinton adviser):

From: David Shuster
To: Philippe Reines
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 9:29 p.m.

No. That’s not what I’m saying. And if you bothered to look at the transcript and saw all of the glowing things I said about chelsea and the way she was raised, you would know that.

The issue is not her making calls. As + said on the air, I have no problems with that what so ever. The issue is not her refusing interviews. The issue is that the campaign has come down hard on reporters who merely sought to ask chelsea questions. You can’t have it both ways. Reporters have long respected the clintons desire that we avoid chelsea and let her have her space. But to get angry at reporters seeking to talk to her now is patently unfair. And you know that.

Honestly, this crap starts with Russert, who clearly hates the Clintons, and reaches a crescendo with Chris Matthews, though it appears that Shuster, who is twice the journalist of Matthews, and three times the journalist of Russert, will take the fall.

Obama To Maine – ‘Drop Dead’

Lets be clear, normally, I find Rense to be an unreliable source, but this is analysis and, there is a video on CNBC where Austan Goolsbee says what Rense says he said.

video where he is dismissive of LIHEAP.

Obama To Maine – ‘Drop Dead’

Blocked Emergency LIHEAP Money For Maine This Winter
2-8-8

AUGUSTA — Barack Obama’s chief economics adviser Austan Goolsbee today boasted that the Obama campaign had helped to prevent emergency heating assistance for low-income families from being included in the just-approved economic stimulus package which is now on its way to President Bush’s desk for signature. An increase in federal low-income heating assistance (known as LIHEAP), Goolsbee pointed out, had been championed by Obama’s opponent, New York Democratic Senator Hillary Clinton. Goolsbee’s remarks came in an interview this morning with Carl Quintanilla of CNBC business news television.”

It’s clear in the video, where Goolsbee dismisses LIHEAP as bureaucratic and wasteful.

Keeping poor people from freezing is a core Democratic Party value. In Maine, it’s a bipartisan value, but the folks who made it to the caucuses there are clearly too well off to qualify for the program, or to care about those who do.

George W. Bush has spent 7 years trying to make the poor poorer, and to denigrate this program, which helps the poor heat their homes in the winter is repulsive.

Goolsbee is “Chicago School Lite” on his economics, which may be useful for contacts with the press, which is increasingly overpaid, overfed (Candy Crowley), and self importantly proclaiming its support for the low wage economics that have prevailed since the mid 1970s, but it is not good for the American people or the Democratic Party.

I Do Not Think That This is Political Posturing

Last night, on MSNBC, David Shuster asked if Chelsea Clinton campaigning on behalf of her mom meant that she was, “being pimped” by the campaign.

The Clinton Campaign has apparently gone completely batsh#$ insane over this, even though he apologized this morning.

Shuster’s still a wanker, though.

This is not about politics. This is about who the Clintons are. They have always been fiercely protective of her.

BTW, Shuster has been suspended from all NBC broadcasts.

The Tweety Effect

Emily’s List is using Chris “Tweety” Matthews’ hostile, and generally sexist, statements about Hillary Clinton to raise money for her:

We’ve seen how far pundits like Chris Matthews will go to define Hillary on their terms. We’ve fought back against the gender stereotypes that keep popping up again and again.

But it’s not going to stop just because we want it to. The only way Hillary can talk to voters unfiltered is if she has enough money to deliver her message of change straight to the grassroots.

Romney Out

Here and here.

And his wanktacular reason?

If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.

Go Huck!!!!

Democrats Like Their Candidates

I was directed toward this comment from CNN’s Bill Schneider

There’s no doubt Democrats are torn between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. But the early exit polls show they are not bitterly divided: 72 percent of Democrats said they would be satisfied if Clinton won the party’s nomination, while 71 percent say the same about Obama.

What ever happens in the primary, it’s clear that Democrats will be voting, and pulling the D* lever, in November.

H/T to Digby for the catch.

*Yes, I know….lever voting machines are a vanishing breed.

Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, missed the vote.

The Senate stimulus package failed cloture by one vote.

Despite their return from the campaign trail, Democrats fell one vote shy of the 60 votes they needed to bring forward their preferred economic stimulus bill.

Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the frontrunner for the Republican nomination, missed the vote.

This is something that both Clinton and Obama, and for that matter Harry Reid, should be harping on right now.

Super Tuesday Returns

I am not going to be awake when California comes in, and I think that it will be California that defines victory on both sides of the ticket.

That being said, here are returns before I set up my computer to burn Avatar disks and go to bed, courtesy of Talking Points Memo:

CLINTON: AR, MA, NJ, NY, OK, TN
OBAMA: AL, CT, DE, GA, KS, IL, MN, ND, UT
HUCKABEE: AR, AL, GA, WV
MCCAIN: AZ, CT, DE, IL, NJ, NY, OK
ROMNEY: MA, UT

Mr. Straight Talk Weasels out of Public Financing Limits

Yep, he’s opted out after opting in.

Mark Schmitt has a fairly detailed analysis of the legalities, and it basically comes down as follows:

  • There has been an advisory ruling that candidates can change their mind until they actually receive the matching funds.
  • He took out a loan for his campaign, but it was not contingent on matching funds, and he is not in the position of renouncing, “an asset if it’s entangled in another transaction”.
  • Because there is no quorum for the FEC, there can be no rulings.

So he appears legal, although he also appears to be a hypocrite.

A Friend Sent Me This

Shout out to Bob.

I think that this is a good analysis of what is at stake:

Howdy Folks!

I have been asked “the question” of this election year, am I for Clinton or Obama.

My perspective abhors those who make a fetish of decrying the good in favor of the perfect.

The criticism most often leveled at me is that by taking this stance, I cut off the possibility for achieving the heights needed to truly make a difference.

I feel uncomfortable bragging, but I have an intellect that at least allows me to perceive the ideals and aspirations that great thinkers put out there for consideration if not understand them completely. My heart tugs me in that direction.

However, belonging to a minority group where the glass ceiling is so low we have to get down on our hands and knees to crawl under it, tells me that defeat now is not an option. That glass ceiling is lowering and crushing the life out of millions.

My experience also tells me that the too oft disparaged “half a loaf” has kept me and millions like me going for most of my life.

The promise of three quarters of a loaf leaving leftovers in the breadbox to inspire a more peaceful nights sleep is not to be turned away from lightly.

Again, on examination, the positions taken by Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama are not that different. It’s just the rhetoric and rhetoric doesn’t pay the bills.

Whoever wins will enforce the civil rights acts and all the other laws and regulations that Bush and his cronies have broken, soiled laws and regulations that Bush and his cronies have broken, soiled and degraded. They will fight an effective war on terrorists using the broad panaply of tools we have that will also restore our self respect, democratic principles and standing around the world and put us on a progressive path towards the future.

Neither one will usher in nirvana, but any Republican will almost certainly doom us to failure and misery for generations.

I will support the nominee of the Democratic Party and even send in my paltry sum of money to help out. More importantly, I know where there is a Democratic Party phone bank that I can volunteer at when the time comes. My lady and I will make dates out of it.

I’m not so much for the nomination of Mrs. Clinton as I am for the nominee winning the Presidency.

Fox News awaits the nominee though.

Fox News and all that Fox News has come to stand for. The legion of right wing enterprises funded by malignant corporate interests, religious nuts and idle, bitter billionaires sucking the marrow of long dead Robber Barons.

Swift Boats will be launched from their pens. Fueled by greed, hatred and sheer self entitled hubrs. Drudge will be drudged up and repeated millions of times as if true. Fair and Balanced panels will be showcased on every hand with screaming fanatics getting the most air and last word from sycophants seeking to keep their ratings and incomes.

Then, of course, there’s Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and their myriad incestuous spawn.

Mrs. Clinton’s negatives and “divisiveness” have been overhyped. Polls and, more importantly election results have shown that these are the result of listening to the GOP and the too cozy media’s confection. Mr. Obama’s negatives have hardly been mentioned. Of course the people who hate the anything “Clinton” will hate Clinton. They’ll hate Obama too; just as hard too, don’t kid yourself.

I’ve heard it said that Mrs. Clinton can’t best Mr. Kerry’s last electoral outing. This forgets the GOP’s wonderfully Just position, displayed for all to see in it’s natural ugliness.

They are historically weak, which needs to be exploited. Not forgiven.

I am not for Mrs. Clinton nor am I against Mr. Obama. I am against losing. Their policies are not that different. Mr. Obama doesn’t have as much experience as Mrs. Clinton. Mrs. Clinton is less inspiring than Mr. Obama.

It is said against her that Mrs. Clinton will do “anything to win.” I dispute that she would do “anything” to win. The “fighting” that has gone on so far in the primaries has been tame, but she fights hard.

I like that. I want someone who can fight back against the horror that the GOP is going to start as soon as we have a nominee.

There will be no dawning of a grand era of Bipartisanship just because Mr. Obama wishes it, calls for it, hopes for it.

The GOP will chainsaw him, his wife and children without a second thought all the while saying what wonderful Chistians they are.

That’s what they do. It’s what they always do.

As they are on the brink of losing power for perhaps generations to come, as they are on the brink of having an Administration come in that may open the vaults on documents that will expose the depths of their depravity, as they are on the brink of having their very ideology, Conservatism, shown for nothing more then still kissing the French Kings ass, they will do this with the savage ferocity of the cornered, venomous beasts they are.

We are about to oust a group of people best described as trying to make us into a Fascist WarMart.

The record is clear, Mrs. Clinton fights. And she wins.

Winning makes everything else possible.

Bob G.

Again, the words above are not mine, I just wish they were.