Category: Secrecy

Calling for Offentlighetsprincipen

In their never ending quest to avoid public scrutiny, Bush and His Evil Minions have introduced a new form of restricted information, Controlled Unclassified information.

Basically, the goal here is not to protect information from enemies, but to keep it from the public, and particularly FOIA requests.

The more I learn about government classification, the more that I think that we need to enshrine the Swedish concept of Offentlighetsprincipen (Openness) in our constitution.

Basically, it says that all government documents are open, except those covered by the following, and only by the following:

  • the security of the Realm or its relations with a foreign state or an international organization;
  • the central finance policy, monetary policy, or foreign exchange policy of the Realm;
  • the inspection, control or other supervisory activities of a public authority;
  • the interest of preventing or prosecuting crime;
  • the public economic interest;
  • the protection of the personal integrity or economic conditions of private subjects;
  • the preservation of animal or plant species.”

This list are the only reason, and, “Secrecy is limited to a maximum time of 70 years (when relating to individuals that is 70 years after the person’s death).”

Given the tradition of secret government in the US over the past 60 years, I think that the list in the US should be more restrictive, as we have a long tradition of bureaucratic figleafs to keep the American people in the dark.

Possible Coverup in Duke Cunningham Affair

The trial of Thomas Kontogiannis, the money man/money launderer of the Duke Cunningham scandal, appears under some sort of government blackout.

The government is saying that the details of the case, which are normally public record, are government secrets, because the government says so.

So very little of the plea has been revealed.

Given the history of the state secrets privilege, it was created in the 1950s, and the US government lied to the court in the case establishing the precedent, United States v. Reynolds, I’m inclined to think that this is more Bush DoJ shenanigans.

They are probably covering up for other corrupt Republicans, Rep. Lewis comes to mind.

Moussaoui Looks to Appeal His Guilty Conviction

He is now claiming that he did not have effective counsel, because his lawyers could not fully brief him on the case, because of secrecy rules.

I don’t think that Mossaoui was the “20th Hijacker”. I think that he was a terrorist wannabee, and I think that he should be locked up for some time, though I’m not sure if that’s in a prison or a high security mental ward, but the fact that Bush and His Evil Minions screwed up this case just stuns me.

These guys could not organize themselves out of a wet paper bag.

Democrats seek to narrow secrets law

An update on my earlier post on the state secrets privilige.

Well now the Senate Judiciary Committee is working on actual legislation requiring that the Judge be given evidence of an actual proof of a state secret before granting such a motion.

The states secret privilege has been abused for many years, and in fact the original case establishing the privilege, United States v. Reynolds, was an abuse of the privilege, as it was revealed there were no secrets involved.