Category: Weapons

Marine Corps Looks to Reduce Firepower

About 4 months ago I mentioned that the Corps was looking at a magazine fed automatic rifle to replace the belt fed M249 SAW.

At the time, I wondered if this was intended simply to replace one M16/M4 in the fire team with something that was full auto, and it’s not.

The Marine Corps has awarded 3 contracts to investigate a replacement.

They are looking for a lighter (12 lb as opposed to 17 lb) magazine fed weapon without a quick change barrel.

Seeing as how the barrel cannot get as hot, because you cannot quickly swap it, and that the firing time is less, as a 30 round mag is a lot less than a 200 round belt.

It seems to me that it’s going back to the concept of the BAR, which was a great weapon (John Browning was an artist), but was never able to find a particularly good application in service. It was too big, too heavy, and did not fire enough rounds to suppress the enemy.

While the successor, in 5.56 should be lighter, it still will not throw enough rounds down range.

It will also be costlier than the obvious solution: Give that one guy in the fire team the Canadian M-16, which does do full auto.

Ma Duce Replacement?

They have been talking about replacing the .50 cal M2 Browning machine gun for decades, and now they are talking about the LW50 as a replacement.

The M2 has some flaws, most notably weight, a lack of a quick change barrel, and the need to set head spacing, but I’ll withhold judgment for now, particularly since I’ve never served of handled an automatic weapon.

It appears that the sticking point may be rate of fire, which is about 2/3 that of the M2.

I always wanted to be John Browning when I grew up.

More on the M4, M16, and the 5.56 Round

Well, first, it appears that as a part of a potential M4/16 replacement, the army is once again looking at the 25mm smart grenade launcher, now called the XM25 Individual Air Burst Weapon, which grew from the abortive Objective Individual Combat Weapon (OICW).

Incorporating this into a standard carbine or rifle is, I thin, a losing proposition. You add weight and complexity when only one person on the fire team really needs to have the weapon under most scenarios.

As such I favor a solution analogous to the M203, which can be installed on the weapon as needed.

There are two issues with the M4 and one with the M-16, they both require a lot of care and cleaning, and the M4 has lethality issues beyond about 50 or so meters.

As to the former, much of the issue is the gas tube system, in which the gas which it tapped to drive the bolt directly, and there is a drop in kit, basically a new upper receiver assembly, which adds a piston, the H&K 416.

While people talk about going with a heavier round, the real problem with lethality with the M4 is that its barrel, at 14-1/2 inches is just too short, and so velocity, and hence energy, suffers. Seeing as how bullpup rifles are shorter with a barrel typically about 4 inches longer, that solves the problem.

As an interim solution, going with the upper receiver replacement makes sense, while one looks at something more extensive.

BTW, good article on the H&K G11, which used a 4.85mm caseless round, which would have been a world beater.

My understanding is that they fixed the cookoff issues, but the rounds, and the weapon, were too fracking expensive.

Here is some gun pr0n, with the pictures from here:


Marine Corps Eyes M249 SAW Replacement

It looks like the Marines are looking at partially replacing their belt fed M249 SAW with a lighter magazine fed automatic rifle.

They are hoping for a 12 lb weapon to replace the 17 lb SAW.

Given that they are also dropping the quick change barrel as a way to get there, and using a slower rate of fire to deal with barrel heating this implies a significant drop in firepower.

Not having served, I’d appreciate any comments from people who have about the merits of such a change.

The US army is looking for a lighter weapon too, but they are sticking with the high rate of fire and belt feed.